Does God Exist? :: essays research papers

In my life on this orbiter I have get laid to question many things that many consent on as blind faith. We all know that someday we result physically die, Yet, we continuously deny the forces working inside ourselves which want to search by the true outcome of what may or may not come after death. Its far easier for kindliness to accept that they will go on to a safe haven and be forgiven for all, rather than to question the globe of a super omnipotent organism. Fortunately, there are some of us who tend to question the whys and hows that come before us. We question the creation of humanity and the religious teachings received from our parents, our church and our society. This paper examines the many rational arguments for and against the cosmea of God. It is based on the views of some of the great philosophers and scientists of our world. I will stage that there is no sufficient proof or comprehensive arguments for the macrocosm of God. Some people search for eternal peac e through the beliefs in God notwithstanding this is an impossible belief because of the chances, the plausibility, and because of science. ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS God for the most part refers to one supreme, holy, personal being,. The divine unity of ultimate good-ness and of ultimate reality. St. Anselm of Canterbury veritable what we have learned to be the ontological argument. He began his argument by saying that even a fool send word grasp or understand the sentimention of "a being than of which zip greater can be conceived." He continues to state that a fool would say that the concept of this beings existence is only in his creative thinker and in the mind of others but not in reality. However he also admits to the possibility of this being existing in reality. Whatever is understood by the fool is argued that than which nothing is greater can be conceived cannot solely exist in the mind but also in reality, hence, God exists. (Angelfire) This personally sounds l ike a salespersons pitch to confuse and conquer for a sale. Gaunilo felt the same. He ofttimes debated with St. Anselm on behalf of the fool. He stated that it was not possible to visualize the concept of this perfect being because one can only imagine an take care when one has an idea of what that image is suppose to resemble.