Equal Opportunity in Education Essay

The whole object of genteelness isto develop the intelligence. (Sherwood Anderson) The United States of America has developed a system to grow its youth by a prevalently funded system. It is the law and born gracious right of each citizen to attend some form of procreation by a particular age. The public school system is set in place for those who choose not to send their offspring to private, religious, or plight schools. This is the present incarnation of the public school system. It is said to be twin in solely manner throughout the state. That has not always been the character reference in this nation. That has brought forth numerous laws and enactments to grant those who find themselves on the lesser side of gaining knowledge more of an equal footing where nurture is concerned. In this land of hazard, there is an expected level of availability that is expected. In a world of intense competition from within and outside of the country education hotshot of the few wa ys of balancing the scales of the socially or m iodinetarily disfavor is proportionate education.In this nation children fail way at one turn on or an separate in history been systematically held back for one reason or another. The reasons differ in the once beliefs that they were not capable to learn or personal thought of not being valued to be taught. In 1896 Plessy vs. Ferguson granted the states the right to uphold the separate however equal doctrine that ruled the land. This was a great lost to all those that held a hope those later generations would do better than those who came before. Education began to run short more balanced when separate but equal was pushed aside by the landmark case of chocolate-brown vs. The Board of Education. In 1954 The Supreme royal court ruled in favor of Henry Billings Brown. This would begin the integration of public school which was the first tonus into equal opportunity for students nationwide. The Title I of the Elementary and Seco ndary Education Act of 1965 was the next big step creating a system that would seek a fair learning experience for all.Its basic notion is that state and local funds for schools should be candid before federal Title I funds are added to schools with spacious concentrations of low-in deal students. (americanprogress.org) The Title I funding has a slight problem in its workings that has been a detriment to the children who attend these schools. The amount of money allocated to the schools is ground on the salaries of the instructors. That is a problem for schools with a high turnover ratio. Schools that have moderately juvenileer staff that is relatively new to the task of educating young minds make less than the veterans of the better school districts. This translates into less money per seeer and that equals less money for the school and the children. It is unfortunate that less money in the long run means less of educational opportunities.The fact is that children in low i ncome areas do not receive a fair share of money. The student invite is not met by the standards laid out by the government. Money is the chemical group of a proper education in this high end scientific world. Without proper funds the simplest of supplies cannot be purchased. Computers, books, calculators, or simple printer sign is not available on a scale that is considered suitable. The eventual sacramental manduction of materials is a detriment to the students who are not allowed to have their own because of miss of equipment ready for use. The civil rights case would eventually open the door for other minorities. One that would take advantage of the Brown ruling was those with disabilities. In Brown the Court declared that it is doubtful that any child may reasonably be expected to succeed in life if he is denied the opportunity of an education. (web.ebscohost.com.library.gcu.edu.) They would use this to rally their forces and demand equal opportunities for cognitively im paired children. mill around vs. the Board of Education of the District of Columbia and the Pennsylvania Association for retarded Children vs. Pennsylvania were two cases that brought the plight of these students to the light of day. The law would be changed to give them the rights that they so richly deserved. The newest in leveling the field of education has come through the No Child Left Behind Act which was write into being by former President George W. Bush in 2002. These reforms declaim my deep belief in our public schools and their mission to build the mind and character of every child, from every background, in every part of America. (George W. Bush, 2001) No Child Left Behind puts an emphasis on improving the spirit of public education.It calls for increased accountability, more choices for parents and students, putting reading first, and a high emphasis on standardized testing. However the standardized testing is one of the biggest problems of the act. The majority of teachers has a problem with the testing and calls it bias. They also put forth that the testing takes away from the true teaching of knowledge, rather they now teach to test. This makes the education of the nation less than competitive with other countries. To combat these problems in our ever changing world we must go back to the beginning. In that thought process society must rethink its past transgressions. The country must avoid the same mistakes of the past.Politicians are not the ones who should make the decisions to jot the future of United States of America. Educators should be in charge of educating the youth. Those who have worn out(p) their lives gaining knowledge to teach the children of their world should be tasked with the job of finding a way to educate equally. This task should be given to those who best sum the job description. The assignment should be outsourced if it is needed. Other countries excel in education and this nation could learn from those who educat e on higher levels. Educating the masses on a more equal platform will only add to greatness.ReferenceQuotes on Education (n.d.) Retrieved whitethorn 20, 2011, fromhttp//www.lhup.edu/dsimanek/eduquote.htmEnsuring Equal Opportunity in Public Education (n.d.) Retrieved May 20, 2011, fromhttp//www.americanprogress.org/issues/2008/06/comparability.htmlPlessy v. Ferguson (n.d.) Retrieved May 20, 2011, fromhttp//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessy_v._FergusonOVERVIEW Executive Summary (n.d.) Retrieved May 21, 2011, fromhttp//www2.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/execsumm.htmlThe Need for Equal Opportunity and a Right to case Education (n.d.) Retrieved May 21, 2011, fromhttp//web.ebscohost.com.library.gcu.edu2048/ehost/detail?Equal Opportunity (n.d.) Retrieved May 21, 2011, fromhttp//web.ebscohost.com.library.gcu.edu2048/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewerAn American perspective on equal educational opportunities (2002) Retrieved May 21, 2011, fromhttp//web.ebscohost.com.library.gcu.edu2048/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfv iewer?