Saving The Animals? :: essays research papers fc

Saving the Animals? In Buffalo New York on October twenty-third of last year, Dr. Barnett Slepian was murdered. He wasnt killed because of his financial status or because of a dispute he had with a patient. Someone who never really knew Dr. Slepian, soulfulness who never met his family, a person who didnt agree with Dr. Slepians job, took his life. This is a great example to show how a disagreement in political theory can lead to actions that no one has the authority to take. An animal liberator barrage a meat processing plant is like the pro-life activist killing the doctor who performs abortions. Both of the actions dont achieve the results that atomic number 18 intended, they both claim that they help save the lives of the innocent, and they be both hypocritical. The results that are cute can non be achieved through causing ail and suffering to the opposing party. When a sniper took the life of Dr. Slepian he was trying to journey the cause of pro-life forward. The end r esult was not what he had wanted the medical community was outraged and the spate who believed in the right to remove strengthened their resolve. This quote by Dr. Henry Morgentaler, the countrys best-known pro-abortion crusader, illustrates this point very accurately. "This is a sign of the moral bankruptcy of the so-called pro-life movement. It bespeaks their frustration and rage at the fact that they have not been able to convince the public of the rightness of their cause," (Cnn 2) The frustration that Dr. Morgentaler mentions is even get on enhanced when the pro-lifers see that their cause is regressing from public empathy. The example of the murder of Dr. Slepian is a good analogy to what the bombing of the meat processing plant would cause. The people in the factory would be massacred and the people who dont raise the cause of animal liberation would be outraged. The intended result of abase consumption of animal meat would not be achieved because the public wou ld not see the righteousness of the cause and where at that place is demand for meat there will be suppliers to meet the demand, this is a basic law of economics. flat if the bomber would bomb every single meat-processing plant in the country, unfearing businessmen would find ways to meet the demand in the country. discharge has always been an unacceptable action in modern society.